Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of power instability on library service delivery at the Federal University of Technology, Minna. The central research question was: How does power instability affect the quality and accessibility of university library services in FUT Minna? The study aimed to examine the frequency of electricity outages, their impact on digital and automated services, and their implications for user satisfaction and institutional accreditation. It also tested the hypothesis that there is no significant relationship between power supply reliability and the quality of library services. A descriptive survey research design was adopted. The total population comprised 29,412 library users, including students and library personnel. From this, a sample size of 420 respondents was selected using stratified random sampling. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and analysis of library usage records. A total of 450 questionnaires were distributed, and 420 were duly completed and retrieved, resulting in a 93.3% response rate. The research instrument's content validity was ensured through expert review, and a Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of 0.82 confirmed its reliability. Findings revealed that frequent and prolonged power outages significantly disrupt access to digital resources, reduce user satisfaction, and hinder compliance with accreditation requirements. A moderate positive correlation (r = 0.45) was found between power reliability and perceived library service quality. While coping mechanisms such as generators and solar panels exist, they remain inadequate for uninterrupted service delivery. The study concludes that stable electricity is essential for effective library service delivery and recommends investments in sustainable energy solutions, enhanced government infrastructure support, and robust backup systems to improve library operations in Nigerian federal universities.

Keywords: Electricity Interruptions, Federal University Libraries, Power Supply Stability, Library User Satisfaction

No objective, objective, hypothesis, sample size, instrument, validity, reliability, number of instrument distributed and retrieved